BACKYARD NY / PROJECT REGISTRY
REC #011 · STATUS: ◐ UNDER REVIEW — CONTESTED
◐In progress

Key Capture Energy BESS — Saugerties

a.k.a. KCE NY 34
7 Tomsons Road · Town of Saugerties · Ulster County · Hudson Valley · Industrial-zoned parcel near the NYS Thruway interchange; nearest home reported ~945 ft away

A 100 MW battery proposed on Tomsons Road, now in a local environmental review the developer asked the town to waive, with a residents' petition pushing for a moratorium.

IMG · GOOGLE PLACES Industrial-zoned parcel near the NYS Thruway interchange; nearest home reported ~945 ft away
Sector
ENERGY-STORAGE
Location
7 TOMSONS ROAD · TOWN OF SAUGERTIES · ULSTER COUNTY · HUDSON VALLEY · INDUSTRIAL-ZONED PARCEL NEAR THE NYS THRUWAY INTERCHANGE; NEAREST HOME REPORTED ~945 FT AWAY
Developer
KEY CAPTURE ENERGY (ALBANY, NY), ADVANCING THE PROJECT THROUGH PROJECT COMPANY KCE NY 34, LLC [fact sheet ›]
Capacity
100 MW · ~400 MWH
Process
SEQRAState Environmental Quality Review Act — New York's environmental review process. A "positive declaration" triggers a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) before any approval. · LOCAL ZONINGLocal zoning — town/village land-use rules and special-use permits. Standalone battery storage is sited locally under home rule.
Source confidence
HIGHhigh — the developer (Key Capture Energy / KCE NY 34, LLC), the 100 MW / 400 MWh 4-hour rating, the 7 Tomsons Road site, the Central Hudson interconnection, the Dec 8 2025 filing, and the SEQRA posture are confirmed to primary sources (Town of Saugerties Planning Board minutes and NYSERDA's project summary). Secondary reporting disagrees on the battery footprint (≈7 vs ≈11 acres) and container count (100 max vs. 110/136 in news), and the lead-agency/declaration status after Feb 2026 is not yet confirmed.
100 MW
Capacity
400 MWh
Energy storage

Background

Town of Saugerties · Ulster County · Energy storage · Status: in progress — under local review, contested

The project

KCE NY 34 is a proposed 100 MW / 400 MWh (4-hour) lithium-ion battery storage facility on an industrial-zoned parcel at 7 Tomsons Road in the Town of Saugerties. It would occupy roughly 7 to 11 acres of a ~60-acre lot — the Planning Board minutes describe about 7 acres of battery development (with 4.6 acres of tree clearing), while the developer's NYSERDA summary estimates about 11 acres — and interconnect at Central Hudson's Saugerties 69/115 kV substation (NYISO queue C24-173). The developer, Key Capture Energy of Albany, would own and operate the site through project company KCE NY 34, LLC, and holds a NYSERDA bulk-storage incentive contract with a target in-service date of December 1, 2030. (NYSERDA project summary; Saugerties Planning Board minutes, Feb 17, 2026)

Status and review

Key Capture Energy filed for site-plan approval and a special-use permit — and asked the town to issue a SEQRA negative declaration — on December 8, 2025. (NYSERDA summary) At the project's first Planning Board presentation on February 17, 2026, the board treated it as a SEQRA Unlisted action, circulated a notice of intent to serve as lead agency, and took in Part 1 of the Full Environmental Assessment Form — meaning the requested negative declaration had not been granted. (Planning Board minutes) The Town Board had separately held an informational Q&A in January 2026 at which residents spoke against the project. (Hudson Valley One)

Unlike neighboring Hurley, Saugerties had not enacted a BESS moratorium or local law as of May 2026 — the central demand of the opposition petition. (The Overlook)

Support and opposition

The developer's representatives — Kolin Loveless and project manager Paul Williamson — point to lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) chemistry, a third-party fire review required under NY's fire code, an incident rate they put at "lower than 0.05% of all BESS installed," and a nearest residence about 945 feet away; the project fact sheet promises 20–40 union construction jobs and tax revenue through a PILOT / Host Community Agreement. (Planning Board minutes; KCE fact sheet)

Opposition is organized around the "Stop the Tomsons Road BESS Project" petition, which had 716 signatures toward a 1,000 goal as of June 2026 and asks the town to deny the application, bar large-scale BESS town-wide, or enact a moratorium. (Change.org) Residents have raised noise — "13 acres of giant electric boxes," in one objector's words — and the absence of an emergency-response plan, and have pressed for a full environmental review rather than a negative declaration. (Hudson Valley One)

Chronology

For it

  • Key Capture Energy (developer) — Kolin Loveless (owner/operator) and project manager Paul Williamson cite LFP chemistry, third-party fire review under NY's fire code, a reported incident rate 'lower than 0.05% of all BESS installed,' and nearest home ~945 ft away [source]
    s fire code, a reported incident rate
  • Key Capture Energy (developer) — project fact sheet promises 20–40 union construction jobs plus tax revenue via a PILOT / Host Community Agreement to be negotiated [source]
  • Jeff Seidman, Vassar College (philosophy/environmental studies) — argues storage is 'a way to stop' burning gas and oil; speaks for storage on climate grounds, not specifically for this site [source]
    a way to stop

Against it

  • 'Stop the Tomsons Road BESS Project' petition (Saugerties Residents Against the Tomsons Road BESS) — demands the town deny the application, bar large-scale BESS town-wide, or at minimum enact a moratorium; 716 signatures toward a 1,000 goal as of June 2026 [source]
    Stop the Tomsons Road BESS Project
  • Eric Delmar, resident — objects to '13 acres of giant electric boxes' and continuous noise [source]
    13 acres of giant electric boxes
  • Ted Maroney, resident — argues the project lacks an emergency-response plan, sidesteps a full SEQRA review, and leaves community compensation unclear [source]
  • Residents at the Jan 21, 2026 Town Board meeting (e.g., Michael Corvin, Deborah Sanchez) — questioned the need for the facility and voiced safety concerns [source]

Context — not for or against

Analysis

Saugerties is the live test of the site-specific review path while a town has no BESS-specific law on its books. The same developer is advancing a comparable project here and the question — negative declaration versus a full environmental review — mirrors what played out at the larger Terra-Gen/Alcazar site in the Town of Ulster, which the Planning Board minutes note is "more than 2x the size." The petition's fallback demand, a moratorium, is the same instrument neighboring Hurley and Plattekill used; whether Saugerties follows or instead resolves the project through SEQRA is the open question this case tracks.

Sources

// every field traceable to a primary source · outcome classified per documented record · BACKYARD NY