BACKYARD NY / PROJECT REGISTRY
REC #010 · STATUS: ✕ KILLED — BANNED
✕Killed

Mission Clear Energy BESS — Plattekill

Plattekill · Ulster County · Hudson Valley

A ~300 MW battery storage proposal that the Town of Plattekill blocked — first with a six-month moratorium, then a town-wide ban on large-scale storage.

IMG · GOOGLE PLACES Plattekill · Ulster County
Sector
ENERGY-STORAGE
Location
PLATTEKILL · ULSTER COUNTY · HUDSON VALLEY
Developer
MISSION CLEAR ENERGY
Capacity
300 MW
Process
MORATORIUM BANA local pause (moratorium) on new projects while rules are studied — or an outright ban.
Source confidence
MEDIUM-HIGHmedium-high — project details, the moratorium, and the unanimous ban are sourced; the exact final-ban vote date still needs the Town Board resolution.
300 MW
Capacity

Background

Plattekill · Ulster County · Energy storage · Status: killed (town-wide ban)

What it would have delivered

A ~300-megawatt battery energy storage system (BESS) proposed by Mission Clear Energy, to be built on 40 acres subdivided from a larger 95-acre parcel at Camp Sunset Road and Rabbit Run Road in the Town of Plattekill. At that scale it would have been one of the larger storage projects in the mid-Hudson Valley, the kind of grid-scale storage contemplated by New York's climate plan. (Southern Ulster Times)

The sequence

  1. Conceptual proposal (2024): Mission Clear Energy floated the 300 MW project.
  2. Moratorium: the Town Board held a public hearing on November 20, 2024 and enacted a six-month moratorium on battery storage while it studied the issue.
  3. The moratorium was extended, then converted into a permanent answer. (Southern Ulster Times)
  4. Ban (fall 2025): the Board voted unanimously to ban large-scale BESS town-wide, citing fire risk, toxic-chemical release, and the difficulty of fully extinguishing lithium-ion battery fires.

Plattekill is one of only ~10 New York jurisdictions whose restriction carries "ALL_BESS" scope — barring battery storage regardless of size — per the statewide tracker. (Carina Energy) The project never reached a SEQRA review or a site-plan vote; the town amended its zoning to prohibit large-scale storage outright.

Chronology

For it

  • Mission Clear Energy (developer) — conceptual 300 MW proposal [source]

Against it

  • Plattekill Town Board — voted unanimously to ban large-scale BESS [source]
  • Local residents — fire, toxic-release & firefighting concerns [source]
  • Ulster County Republicans — campaigned against battery-storage facilities [source]

Context — not for or against

Analysis

The safety concerns the board cited are concrete: lithium-ion fires are difficult to extinguish, and the December 2025 Warwick fire is a local reference point. The question the case raises is one of regulatory approach — whether storage is governed by setback rules, fire codes, and siting standards applied to specific proposals, or by a blanket town-wide prohibition. The choice carries implications for New York's 6 GW storage target, which depends on the cumulative outcome of local decisions like this one.

Sources

// every field traceable to a primary source · outcome classified per documented record · BACKYARD NY